| relying on the knowledge that the California Court of Appeal regularly overturns jury verdicts against school districts, preferring to disregard the law and the judgment of citizens in favor of school districts. |


| Kelly Angell first got the order at right, for October 28, 2004 then got it changed because Maura Larkins was available. (Yes, available. Angell wanted to get a date on which she knew Larkins was unavailable.) She did this by making Larkins believe that issue was resolved, since Larkins agreed to the October 28th date. |
| Original order re deposition made at Stutz' request |

| Maura Larkins agreed to one of the dates demanded |
| Stutz' goal was to subvert justice through manipulation, secrecy, and blatant abuse of the court, relying on the court's preference for clumsy, dishonest lawyers over honest in pro per litigants. How else was Stutz able to obtain so many protective orders? To successfully use its own abuse of discovery as a way to get its opponents' case thrown out? |


| Elizabeth Schulman's lawyer Matthew C. Smith of Klinedinst engaged in similar behavior to that of Stutz, suddenly claiming he had been planning for a long time to go on a trip--he just never mentioned it. He prevented Maura Larkins from taking her deposition at a manageable time, wanting to make it impossible for her to attend two depositions at once, and thereby getting her lawsuit thrown out. Shame on Judge Styn for pretending that Schulman and Smith weren't abusing the rules of discovery and the rules of professional conduct. Judge Styn clearly wanted to get rid of an in pro per plaintiff, even though he had to fly in the face of reason and fact to do so. |


| Jeffery Morris and Kelly Angell wouldn't agree to a date for a deposition, apparently for fear that it might actually be convenient. But, along with Bernard Rohrbacher and Michael Hersh of CTA, and Deborah Garvin, they found another way to make a deposition impossible: verbal abuse, preventing the deponent, who was representing herself, to speak as counsel, in addition to speaking as deponent. |

| For Stutz, Artiano, Shinoff & Holtz, junior high-style trickery takes the place of the practice of law Trick regarding deposition date |
| After agreeing to deposition date and thus making ex parte hearing unnecessary, Kelly Angell AKA Minnehan of Stutz went to an ex parte hearing (after making Larkins believe it was canceled) and got Larkins' deposition date changed to a date on which Angell knew that Larkins would be unable to attend |

| SAN DIEGO EDUCATION REPORT |