February 14, 2005
To: Ray Artiano, Daniel Shinoff and Jeffery Morris
From: Maura Larkins
We’ve stuck to your Plan A script for four years now in this case, and I just want
to make sure that’s what you want to continue to do. I’m happy with Plan A
because it has enabled me to learn so much and become involved in a bigger
world than when I was in my classroom. That world keeps getting bigger and
more interesting, so I’m not entirely averse to continuing in this manner.
On the other hand, I am, and always have been, very concerned about the
children in Chula Vista, and the teachers who are caught in a web of lies. This
situation will be resolved one day, when the truth is exposed. I think it would
benefit the children, teachers, and your clients if you would change to Plan B.
We could work together to find a solution to this problem. Why don’t we get a
mediator who will help us evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of our
respective positions, and agree on a plan that offers each of us the best that
we can hope to get from this case?
I am leaving on vacation shortly, so I plan to file my DOES motion before I go. If
you want to get this case over with, please give me a call today.
Letter to Ray Artiano re Plan B February 14, 2005 |
| Maura Larkins v. Richard Werlin and CTA with Judge Nevitt |
| BLOGS |
| Defamation Suit |
| Lawyers |
| Public Records Requests |
| Payments to Shinoff |
| Maura Larkins v. CVESD |
| Deposition of Maura Larkins Judge Ahler OAH page 89-91 Is Shinoff or Mark Bresee to blame? pages 91-94 pages 95-105 pages 105-111 pages 112-123 pages 124-138 pages 138 - Errata and signature page |